Van's Air Force - Western Canada Wing
Van's Air Force
Western Canada Wing
|
|
Drag Percentages
This is a reproduction of two posts to
the rec.aviation.homebuilt newsgroup on the internet. The posts,
by John Johnson and Corky Scott present some interesting ideas about the
drag on a light airplane, and were inspired by a question about the percentages
of drag from various sources on an “average” homebuilt airplane..
John is the EAA Technical Counselor
for Chapter 277, and has inspected quite a few RV's of various flavors.
“It is a good design, one of a handful that I actually recommend to people
who are looking for an airplane to build,” he says.
Corky is a regular contributor to the
newsgroup, who always has interesting insights into airplane building and
aerodynamics.
Charles K. (Corky) Scott
There are lots of places to counter drag.
Take a look at the “Mister Mulligan” next time you see it at a big fly
in for hints on where to pay attention to streamlining and other details.
With an air-cooled flat engine, “efficient”
and “airflow” really shouldn’t be spoken together. The intake openings
are in an ok space, but often the openings are simply flat cutouts against
the nose. You’ll notice that the most efficient openings are round
holes with a protruding lip around them and often they are smaller in size
than what you are used to.
The air must go past the cylinders, which
are very draggy. Then the air, which has just become heated and therefore
wants to rise, is forced down and out the bottom of the cowl, usually.
Often the air must go by numerous objects within the engine compartment,
each of which makes their contribution to the drag of the flow. Then
the air is going downward and must transition to horizontal flow to match
that of the air passing the fuselage. A torturous route for air to
follow.
Some aerodynamicists attempt to alleviate
the flow problem by exiting the air in front of the windshield, which is
good in that at least the heated air wants to go up. But it’s bad
in that close to the windshield it is a high pressure zone. Air exhausted
into a high pressure zone will flow very poorly, if at all.
That’s why, in theory anyway, it’s possible
to set up a more efficient flow-through system using a radiator for a liquid
cooled engine than to design something for an air cooled flat four.
Unfortunately, it’s still not easy because unless you use a radiator specifically
designed for your space considerations, you will face compromises in fitting
it. Lots of guys lay the radiator down flat and bend flow through
it. This works, but obviously isn’t as good as flow straight through
an upright radiator so the air doesn’t have to bend much.
Then again when you’re dealing with an
airplane that only cruises at 130 max and has a big high-lift wing, would
having the perfect cooling system make any difference?
John Johnson
Unfortunately, I can’t give you a list of
numbers, like 30% cooling, 28% wing, 37% fuselage, 10% gear, etc.
Any numbers I gave would only apply to one specific design in one specific
condition. I know, you did specify the “cruise” condition, which
is probably the most reasonable speed to evaluate an airplane for drag.
However, I can make a few general statements.
Cooling drag, for a piston engine airplane, is one of the largest contributors
of drag at cruising speeds. That is because you must have enough
cooling to keep things from overheating on a hot day with an extended slow
speed climb. That is your critical condition. Very few airplanes
actually have enough cooling to climb for any length of time at the maximum
climb rate speed on a hot day without overheating somewhere. You
will often find a “cruise climb” recommended for that reason. The
higher airspeed in a “cruise climb” allows slightly better cooling.
Clearly, the mods that do the most to increase
speed when airplanes are “modded” for speed have to do with reducing cooling
drag. The P-51 is a case in point, as are all of the airplanes that
have been worked over by LoPresti. The first thing he does is clean
up the cooling system. That is probably where the largest gains can
be made for minimum effort.
The next largest contributor to drag is
probably that caused by gaps and intersections. Good fairing and
gap seals are the next largest contributor and the next best return for
effort. Notice the plethora of speed mods that do things like seal
gaps and fair protrusions. This includes sealing around wheel wells
and around doors and windows.
The old Lindbergh trick was to go up and
fly in the rain. Look around you at the airplane. Every place
you see water piling up tells you where you need a fairing! It even
gives you a good idea of the size and shape of the fairing. Some
are quite counter-intuitive.
A simple rule that will help clean up
an airplane design is this. Every time air has to turn a corner or
change direction it causes drag. The sharper the corner, or the greater
the change in direction, the larger the drag increment. That is why
the most drag comes from the back side of something pushed through the
air. You have to move air to fill the gap where you just went by.
You can see the result of drag with a boat
by the wake. Airplanes make a similar wake and the magnitude of the
wake is a direct measure of the energy spent making the wake. That
wake-making energy is what we call “drag.” Look at the wake
behind a canoe and compare that to the wake behind a standard V-bottom
powerboat. The drag and the wake of a boat increases alarmingly at
a certain speed based on the waterline length. This is similar to
the effect of Reynolds Number in aerodynamics. Drag can be quite
low at speeds low enough to remain relatively laminar. As speed increases
and Reynolds Number increases, laminar flow becomes much harder to maintain.
If you place a burning cigarette in an
ashtray in a still room, you can see a smooth tight stream of smoke rising
above it. Suddenly, a few inches above the burning cigarette, the
tight smooth column of smoke will break into swirls and eddies and increase
markedly in size. That is the laminar/turbulent transition point.
Anything will trip the flow mode. There is no way you can force the
stream to turn and stay laminar. The turbulent flow has a lot more
wake, hence drag
A member of the
Web Standards Project
|
Support free speech.
|
Built on...
...FreeBSD
|
|
|
Van's Air Force Western Canada Wing is not affiliated in any way with Van's Aircraft Incorporated. Western Canada RVator is not a publication of Van's Aircraft or any other corporation. All products reviewed or mentioned are not necessarily recommended for use by RV builders, but are described for information only. All builder's tips are presented only as a source of information and a forum for exchange and the sharing of ideas and construction methods. No responsibility is assumed, expressed, or implied as to the suitability, accuracy, safety, or approval thereof. Any party using the suggestions, ideas, or examples does so at his or her own risk and discretion and without recourse against anyone. The members of Van's Air Force Western Canada Wing, the editor of the Western Canada RVator, and all authors and contributors are not responsible for any product or builder's tips misuse, incorrect construction, or design failure, nor any other peril.
All material on this web site is copyright Van's Air Force Western Canada Wing, or copyright the attributed author, unless otherwise noted.
|
For comments or suggestions on this web site, please write to